- 1. The Scope of the Book: Estate Planning Introduced
- 1.2.3 Other Taxes
- 1.5.14 Tackling tax avoidance: the 22 June 2010 Emergency Budget Proposals
- 1.6.1 ‘Spotlights’ and ‘Signposts’
- 2. Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
- 3. Making Gifts: Outright or Protected?
- 3.2.3 The pre-owned assets regime
- 3.2.4 Settlor-interested trusts: Income Tax and CGT
- 3.6.3 Formation
- 4. Trusts: Tax-Efficient Management
- 4.4.3 Capital Gains Tax
- 4.7.6 Related settlements
- 4.9.3 Power to accumulate or a discretion over income
- 5. The Family Home(s)
- 6. The Family Business
- 6.1.3 Capital Gains Tax angles
- 6.1.4 Other taxes
- 6.2.7 The period of ownership
- 6.3.1 The announcement of 24 January 2007 - and increasing thresholds
- 6.3.2 The detail of the legislation
- 6.6.2 Partnerships
- 9. Investments
- 10. Life Assurance
- 11. Pensions
- 11.1.2 Pensions not to be used for IHT mitigation
- 11.5.1 Overview
- 11.5.5 Death benefits
- 11.5.6 Age 75: ASP or annuity purchase?
- 12. Charitable Giving
- 12.2 Charities: The ‘fit and proper persons’ test in FA 2010
- 12.2.3 Tax advantages for donors summarised
- 12.2.3.1 Gift aid carry back: time limit for claim
- 13. The Family Unit
- 15. Leaving the UK
- 15.3.7 Gifts from UK to non-UK domiciliaries and reservation of benefit
- 15.3.8 Domicile: prospective government review
- 15.5.7 Differing status for different members of the family
- 16. Non-UK Domiciliaries Living in the UK
- 16.1.5 Further review of non-doms promised on 22 June 2010
- 16.3.2 Compliance
- 16.4.4 IHT and double taxation: the pre-capital transfer tax treaties and Switzerland
- 16.6.1 The statutory rule
- 16.6.2.1 Excluded property settlements and the UK private residence
- 17. Offshore Trusts and Companies
- 17.5.2 The capital payments charge in more detail
- 17.7.4 The transfer of assets abroad regime: non-UK resident childrens trusts
- 18. Wills
- 18.4.3 The transferable nil-rate band
- 18.5.5 Different structures: the balance of advantage
- 18.6.1 The issues, subject to the transferable nil-rate band
- 18.6.2 Statement of Practice SP 10/79
- 19. Post-death Planning
- 20. Compliance
Chapter: 2 - Inheritance Tax Mitigation: The Basics
The problem
2.4.1
The relentless rise in house prices over the last 20 years or so, albeit more recently suffering something of a reversal, is a problem not just for the first time buyer but also for the next generation on the deaths of the older property-owning generation. This is of course especially the case if one (or more) of the children wants to carry on living in the home which may have been in the family for some generations. So, what does one do, other than simply moving out and making a gift which one survives by seven years?
It was in response to several well-publicised successful attempts to avoid the GWR regime (by making an effective gift for IHT purposes while remaining in occupation) that the POA rules were introduced from 2005/06: see 3.2.2 and 3.2.3. While there are various planning possibilities open, the overriding concern must be the taxpayer’s own security of tenure if contemplating any form of lifetime gift. There is an obvious commercial risk in making a gift of the house to the children, even if the donor manages to avoid both the GWR and POA regimes. If the children then become insolvent or embroiled in matrimonial difficulties the house may have to be sold. Also, there is probably not much point in entering into an arrangement which might escape the rules on a technicality but which is more than likely to be attacked by HMRC later on.


